01 / Salesforce assessment & remediation

Know what to fix.
Know why it matters.

For teams navigating technical debt, fragile automation, integration issues, or difficult releases. Start with the evidence. Make changes with a plan.

ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW / SALESFORCE
01 / ORG CONTEXTRead the systemApex classes · FlowsPermissions · ObjectsIntegration dependenciesSource evidence02 / TECHNICAL REVIEWFollow the evidenceTrace execution pathsInspect database writesCheck fault handlingReview checkpoint03 / VERIFIED FINDINGSEstablish the impactConfirm transaction impactSeparate leads from defectsPrioritize with contextTechnical validation04 / REMEDIATIONPlan the changeScope a refactorDefine acceptance testsReview before releaseAgreed next step
ORG CONTEXT → TECHNICAL REVIEW → VERIFIED FINDINGS → REMEDIATION
ASSESSMENT EXPLORERIllustrative scenario · synthetic data
SF–001 / FLOWEvidence → action

One case. Two follow-up tasks.

In this test scenario, repeated updates to an eligible case create duplicate tasks. The Flow does not check for an existing task.

Why it matters

Redundant work enters the support queue. Confirm frequency and operational impact in the customer’s environment.

Recommended next step

Agree the task-creation rule, inspect other automation paths, and add a duplicate-prevention check.

✓

Acceptance: one eligible case creates one task; repeated updates create no additional task.

Proposed behavior / example
Case updatedEligible for follow-up
↓
Follow-up FlowCheck for an existing task
↙ Existing task
Keep taskNo duplicate created
No task ↘
Create taskOne valid follow-up
Review other task-creation paths before release.
AI-assisted analysis → technical verification → prioritized recommendation Read the sample ↗

Three connected deliverables

From observations
to decisions.

The assessment stands on its own. Use the findings with your team, or engage NikSon separately for implementation.

01

Health report

Reviewed areas, key risks, and open questions. Coverage is explicit, including what was not assessed.

COVERAGE + PRIORITIES
02

Verified findings

Confirmed issues connected to technical evidence, business context, and recommended action.

EVIDENCE + IMPACT
03

Remediation backlog

Prioritized work with dependencies, effort bands, and ownership fields for delivery planning.

ACTION + ACCEPTANCE

Assessment coverage

Look across the org.
Be precise about scope.

Coverage is agreed before the review. Metadata alone does not establish runtime behavior or record-level data quality.

01

Flow & automation

Overlapping logic, entry conditions, fault paths, and test coverage.

02

Apex & custom code

Maintainability, error handling, queries, and testing practices.

03

Integrations

Dependencies, authentication boundaries, retries, and failure handling.

04

Data model

Relationships, configuration, and structural complexity.

05

Security & permissions

Sharing, profiles, permission sets, and agreed access paths.

06

Dependencies & releases

Package dependencies, change impact, and release considerations.

Optional implementation

A practical path
from findings to fixes.

Implementation follows the assessment and a separate agreement. We define the changes, tests, and handover before building.

Flow & process improvements 01

Refine entry rules, remove redundant automation, add fault handling, and test the agreed business scenarios.

Apex & custom development 02

Remediate agreed code issues, improve maintainability, and deliver tests and technical documentation.

Integration improvements 03

Implement scoped changes to data exchange, failure handling, and system boundaries. Third-party changes are explicitly agreed.

Data model & access changes 04

Apply agreed configuration and permissions changes, with impact review and validation by the designated owners.

Release preparation & handover 05

Prepare testing evidence, release instructions, and operational guidance. Your team authorizes production deployment.

Know the engagement

Clear scope.
Useful boundaries.

Included in assessment

Evidence and a readout.

Agreed review coverage, three connected reports, prioritized recommendations, and a walkthrough.

You provide

Context and approved access.

Relevant code and configuration, known concerns, and a designated technical contact. AI-tool use is agreed in advance.

Separately scoped

Changes and deeper investigation.

Implementation, runtime investigation, record-level data audits, and production access need a separate agreement.

Optional after delivery

Bounded maintenance.

Repeat reviews and agreed improvements can be arranged with defined capacity and response expectations.

A sample assessment

See the findings.
Understand the priorities.

Explore a fictional nine-domain scorecard. Select a review area to see the supporting finding and recommended next step.

Org Health ScorecardSample review · synthetic data
ASSESSMENT / OVERVIEW

Your org. A clearer picture.

09Review domains
03Example findings
01Prioritized plan
AI-assisted analysis. Expert verification. No live org data.
↗
Findings become a plan.Evidence → priority → acceptance

Flow architecture / explore the evidence

Follow the logic.
Understand the risk.

Switch between the scanned structure and a proposed refactor. Select a node to inspect the evidence. Scanner leads require technical validation.

Open the full Flow example ↗

02 / Support workflow automation

Keep support work moving.

Our second service connects intake, triage, routing, and follow-up into a defined workflow.

Explore support workflow automation ↗
Start with a conversation

Bring your Salesforce challenge.

A free 30-minute introductory call to understand your priorities, discuss fit, and agree a sensible starting point.

Talk to an architect ↗